Theory of Homogeneous Mass
"Since, according to our current understanding, even the elementary particles of matter are
essentially nothing other than condensations of the electromagnetic field, our current worldview recognizes two conceptually completely separate,
albeit causally linked, realities, namely the gravitational ether and the electromagnetic field,
or—as one could also call them—space and matter." (A.E.5.5.1920)
I drive my car at 100 km/h past a parking lot containing a hundred cars of comparable size.
Then, all of these cars have the same increase in mass relative to me as my car has relative to a pedestrian, i.e., 100 times more.
Where does this mass come from? Why do electrons have no diameter? Why are there no free quarks?
There is a black hole information paradox that neither general relativity nor the Higgs theory* resolves.
Claim: Only spacetime exists!
Doesn't this contradict the claim: "Only mass exists"** in the
"Theory of the Isentropic World"?
Not if you consider the equation spacetime = mass.
This new theory is therefore dual to the "Theory of the Isentropic World."
ight, as we know, moves at the speed of light. But where the speed of light prevails, nothing moves.
Space is contracted to zero, and time is infinitely stretched. When a radio antenna transmits, it polarizes spacetime;
this polarization propagates at the speed of light in any inertial frame. We detect radio waves, which we also call electromagnetic waves.
Assume that there is only one mass, which is also spacetime. Without particles,
it would be evenly distributed throughout the universe. Since there is then no distinct inertial frame,
spacetime would not be an ether in the classical sense.
It is further stated that all mass or energy comes from this mass according to the law of conservation of energy.
An electron has a charge; it attracts polarized mass, like a rubbed plastic ruler makes shredded paper float.***
This compresses spacetime, creating an apparent force, the "gravitational pull."
Presumably, there is no mass pull**** at all, the compression has only deformed the background mass.
When an electron collides with a positron, the charges cancel each other out. The mass is no longer compressed.
It is then distributed throughout the world as redshifted gamma rays at greater distances. It thus disappears again into the background mass.
Quarks also have a charge. But they are heavier than electrons. If free quarks existed, they would have to be lighter than electrons.
Black holes only exist above a certain size. Gravity is only an apparent force, just as compressed space explains the cosmic background radiation.
This effect is amplified by potential energy, also known as "dark matter." General relativity describes a curvature of spacetime caused by mass,
adding the element of spacetime compression and thus background mass..
Mysteries remain, however. What is a charge? Ordinary matter can move at most at the speed of light.
Perhaps it's like the interference of light. Energy disappears in one place but reappears somewhere else.
I believe mass turns out to be merely a numerical quantity and has nothing to do with the human concept of substance.*****
Ludwig Resch
*I don't deny that the Higgs theory inspired me to develop this theory.
**Here, I'm referring more to the basis of existence. Of course, there is also quantum information or abstract things.
But such things require mass for their existence.
***It doesn't necessarily have to be electrostatic attraction; it could also be the energy contained in the particle.
The only thing that matters is the seamless transition of mass into spacetime
---Mass is always energy, and energy is mass,
even if it is not locally present (definition of "ghost mass").
****Gravity itself is not caused electrically, but by the continuity (homogeneity) of spacetime or background mass.
*****Es gibt eine Vorwegnahme dieser Theorie:
Roman Sexl writes in his book "Raum Zeit Relativität" Page 145:
From our new perspective, it seems downright remarkable... However, it has been proven that other conservation laws,
such as charge conservation, are responsible for the special role of rest energy." Illusion?
Note:
It is similar to Mach's worldview, except that the total mass of the world is the infinitely
large space-time. But importantly: Space-time itself does not possess the property of an inertial frame. Why?
Potential energy has no inherent inertia and no viscosity. The background mass, or space-time, does not possess the properties of the classical ether.
Homogeneity is a technical term in physics and means translation invariance.
A more understandable term would be "theory of continuous mass."
|