Black Holes in Einstein and in the "Snow Globe Theory"
In Einstein's theory, the definition is derived from the Schwarzschild radius.
At the surface, the Schwarzschild metric has a singularity;
only Hawking radiation can escape the black hole.
In the "snow globe theory," the so-called event horizon exists when the gravity at the surface is so strong that light is bent in a circle.
A comet has a hyperbolic or elliptical orbit around a star.
Light, which has only one velocity, can (coming from a hyperbolic path)
bend into a circular or spiral path at most. This radius depends on the mass of the star.
The larger the radius, the easier it is to bend light. If the radius is large enough,
a weak central gravity is sufficient to bend light into a circle.
However, a singularity in the potential is not necessary for weak gravity
Nevertheless, every object without propulsion disappears behind this event horizon because,
with light, momentum per unit total energy reaches a maximum value.*
In the "Theory of the Isentropic World",
however, everything must be mortal (except stupidity), including a black hole.
The matter in the black hole has lost a great deal of potential energy.
The remaining energy is converted into Fermi pressure. In an elastic interaction between two masses,
the lighter object generally receives the greater energy. This is due to the law of conservation of momentum.
Thus, it is expected that only small particles, such as protons, neutrons, and leptons, will escape the black hole.
To generate light, accelerated electric charge is necessary. In the case of the Sun, this is plasma.
However, plasma has rest mass. If it exists at all, it is only deep within the black hole.
The black hole would have to be largely dark, not to mention the redshift.
My hypothesis:
A black hole is a neutron star so massive that light is forced around its outer surface.
This makes the neutron star almost invisible. Smaller black holes cannot exist. In my opinion, potential energy has nothing to do with rest mass.
It ends at a certain Fermi pressure. If you want to compress this mass further, you have to add energy.
However, this creates mesons, which increase the number of particles, resulting only in a stronger counter-pressure.
Decaying mesons might then give the baryons the necessary momentum to catapult them out of the black hole.
Hawking radiation is therefore superfluous,
but not Hawking's idea that virtual particles become real particles under these conditions.
A gravitational collapse does not occur in my theory.
*Derivation from the Einstein-Dirac energy-momentum relation, or c²p/Etotal = v, where v (= velocity) is at most c.
Here, the momentum is chosen perpendicular to the radius.
If an object cannot escape the star without propulsion, there is always a (time) point where this is true,
or it falls directly into the star.
Note: Scientists who subscribe to the Schwarzschild theory also refer to this layer as the photosphere. However,
if the accretion disk were located beneath it,
this would lead to a contradiction, because all matter with rest energy would then have to fall into the black hole.
Ludwig Resch
|