Snow Globe Metrik

Snow Globe Metric
In snow globe theory, there is no ether; space and nonlocal scales depend on the observer's position. How can this be accounted for in a one-body system? Let the radius of the local point of position be R_b, T = M·G/c². This yields the following metric: ds² = c²·dt²·(1+T/ R_b)²/(1+T/ R)²-dr²·(1+T/ R)²/(1+T/ R_b)²-r²·(dϑ²+dφ²·sin(ϑ)²) Locally, this metric leads to the Minkowski metric; as R_b approaches infinity, it would be the Schwarzschild metric with snow globe potential. Due to the antimetry, this metric applies only in the direction of the star. For R greater than R_b, the form is as follows: ds² = c²·dt²·(1+T/ R)²/(1+T/R_b)²-dr²·(1+T/ R_b)²/(1+T/ R)²-r²·(dϑ²+dφ²·sin(ϑ)²) The potentials, as well as the factors associated with them, are replaced by their reciprocals. Note: There may be an additional dependence of R and T on R_b; for instance, involving the ghost mass of the central star. Ludwig Resch

Snow Globe Metric

In snow globe theory, there is no ether; space and nonlocal scales depend on the observer's position. How can this be accounted for in a one-body system?
Let the radius of the local point of position be R_b, T = M·G/c². This yields the following metric:

ds² = c²·dt²·(1+T/ R_b)²/(1+T/ R)²-dr²·(1+T/ R)²/(1+T/ R_b)²-r²·(dϑ²+dφ²·sin(ϑ)²)
Locally, this metric leads to the Minkowski metric; as R_b approaches infinity, it would be the Schwarzschild metric with snow globe potential.
Due to the antimetry, this metric applies only in the direction of the star. For R greater than R_b, the form is as follows:
ds² = c²·dt²·(1+T/ R)²/(1+T/R_b)²-dr²·(1+T/ R_b)²/(1+T/ R)²-r²·(dϑ²+dφ²·sin(ϑ)²) The potentials, as well as the factors associated with them, are replaced by their reciprocals.
Note:
There may be an additional dependence of R and T on R_b; for instance, involving the ghost mass of the central star.

Ludwig Resch